↓ Skip to main content

Development and implementation of an online clinical pathway for adult chronic kidney disease in primary care: a mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and implementation of an online clinical pathway for adult chronic kidney disease in primary care: a mixed methods study
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12911-016-0350-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maoliosa Donald, Kerry McBrien, Wes Jackson, Braden J. Manns, Marcello Tonelli, Kathryn King-Shier, Kailash Jindal, Richard Z. Lewanczuk, Nairne Scott-Douglas, Ted Braun, Sharon E. Straus, Christopher Naugler, Meghan J. Elliott, Min Jun, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn

Abstract

Primary care physicians and other primary health care professionals from Alberta, Canada identified a clinical pathway as a potential tool to facilitate uptake of clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis, management and referral of adults with chronic kidney disease. We describe the development and implementation of a chronic kidney disease clinical pathway (CKD-CP; www.ckdpathway.ca ). The CKD-CP was developed and implemented based on the principles of the Knowledge-To-Action Cycle framework. We used a mixed methods approach to identify the usability and feasibility of the CKD-CP. This included individual interviews, an online survey and website analytics, to gather data on barriers and facilitators to use, perceived usefulness and characteristics of users. Results are reported using conventional qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics. Eighteen individual interviews were conducted with primary care physicians, nephrologists, pharmacists and nurse practitioners to identify themes reflecting both barriers and facilitators to integrating the CKD-CP into clinical practice. Themes identified included: communication, work efficiency and confidence. Of the 159 participants that completed the online survey, the majority (52 %) were first time CKD-CP users. Among those who had previously used the CKD-CP, 94 % agreed or strongly agreed that the pathway was user friendly, provided useful information and increased their knowledge and confidence in the care of patients with CKD. Between November 2014 and July 2015, the CKD-CP website had 10,710 visits, 67 % of which were new visitors. The 3 most frequently visited web pages were home, diagnose and medical management. Canada, Indonesia and the United States were the top 3 countries accessing the website during the 9 month period. An interactive, online, point-of-care tool for primary care providers can be developed and implemented to assist in the care of patients with CKD. Our findings are important for making refinements to the CKD -CP website via ongoing discussions with end-users and the development team, along with continued dissemination using multiple strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 20%
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 29 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 22%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2022.
All research outputs
#5,212,230
of 25,126,845 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#455
of 2,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,797
of 351,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,126,845 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.