You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Where is critical analysis of power and positionality in knowledge translation?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-021-00726-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chloe Crosschild, Ngoc Huynh, Ismalia De Sousa, Eunice Bawafaa, Helen Brown |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 14 | 34% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| Djibouti | 2 | 5% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Oman | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 21 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 15 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 12 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,446,828
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#138
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,847
of 460,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.