You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A practical guide to estimating the light extinction coefficient with nonlinear models—a case study on maize
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-021-00753-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josefina Lacasa, Trevor J. Hefley, María E. Otegui, Ignacio A. Ciampitti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| Argentina | 2 | 18% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 22% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,262,038
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#316
of 1,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,906
of 439,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#8
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.