You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-hotspot PIK3CA mutations are more frequent in CLOVES than in common or combined lymphatic malformations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-021-01898-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pascal Brouillard, Matthieu J. Schlögel, Nassim Homayun Sepehr, Raphaël Helaers, Angela Queisser, Elodie Fastré, Simon Boutry, Sandra Schmitz, Philippe Clapuyt, Frank Hammer, Anne Dompmartin, Annamaria Weitz-Tuoretmaa, Jussi Laranne, Louise Pasquesoone, Catheline Vilain, Laurence M. Boon, Miikka Vikkula |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Belgium | 2 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 67% |
| Scientists | 6 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,763,715
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#181
of 2,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,736
of 448,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#9
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.