↓ Skip to main content

A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of Traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laParoscopic fASt track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of Traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laParoscopic fASt track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (TAPAS study)
Published in
BMC Surgery, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2482-10-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jurrian C Reurings, Willem R Spanjersberg, Henk JM Oostvogel, Erik Buskens, John Maring, Flip Kruijt, Camiel Rosman, Peter van Duivendijk, Cees HC Dejong, Cees JHM van Laarhoven

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 64 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Postgraduate 9 13%
Researcher 8 12%
Other 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 16 24%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,191,837
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#66
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,449
of 95,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.