You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Landscape and selection of vaccine epitopes in SARS-CoV-2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-021-00910-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christof C. Smith, Kelly S. Olsen, Kaylee M. Gentry, Maria Sambade, Wolfgang Beck, Jason Garness, Sarah Entwistle, Caryn Willis, Steven Vensko, Allison Woods, Misha Fini, Brandon Carpenter, Eric Routh, Julia Kodysh, Timothy O’Donnell, Carsten Haber, Kirsten Heiss, Volker Stadler, Erik Garrison, Adam M. Sandor, Jenny P. Y. Ting, Jared Weiss, Krzysztof Krajewski, Oliver C. Grant, Robert J. Woods, Mark Heise, Benjamin G. Vincent, Alex Rubinsteyn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 51% |
| Scientists | 11 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 191 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 61 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 67 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,825,705
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#399
of 1,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,643
of 460,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#14
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.