You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Strategies for monitoring and updating clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-109 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Martínez García, Ingrid Arévalo-Rodríguez, Ivan Solà, R Brian Haynes, Per Olav Vandvik, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Updating Guidelines Working Group |
| Abstract |
Scientific knowledge is in constant change. The flow of new information requires a frequent re-evaluation of the available research results. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are not exempted from this phenomenon and need to be kept updated to maintain the validity of their recommendations. The objective of our review is to systematically identify, describe and assess strategies for monitoring and updating CPGs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 17% |
| Spain | 5 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 60% |
| Scientists | 6 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 60 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Librarian | 6 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 38% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,341,362
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#226
of 1,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,665
of 286,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.