You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Most published meta-regression analyses based on aggregate data suffer from methodological pitfalls: a meta-epidemiological study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-021-01310-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Geissbühler, Cesar A. Hincapié, Soheila Aghlmandi, Marcel Zwahlen, Peter Jüni, Bruno R. da Costa |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 18% |
| Singapore | 1 | 9% |
| Finland | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| China | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 31% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,334,953
of 23,372,207 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#358
of 2,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,573
of 446,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#7
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,372,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.