You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Quality of reporting of clinical non-inferiority and equivalence randomised trials - update and extension
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-13-214 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Petra Schiller, Nicole Burchardi, Michael Niestroj, Meinhard Kieser |
Abstract |
Non-inferiority and equivalence trials require tailored methodology and therefore adequate conduct and reporting is an ambitious task. The aim of our review was to assess whether the criteria recommended by the CONSORT extension were followed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 70 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 20% |
Researcher | 10 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 19 | 26% |
Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 55% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Mathematics | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |