↓ Skip to main content

Quality of reporting of clinical non-inferiority and equivalence randomised trials - update and extension

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality of reporting of clinical non-inferiority and equivalence randomised trials - update and extension
Published in
Trials, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petra Schiller, Nicole Burchardi, Michael Niestroj, Meinhard Kieser

Abstract

Non-inferiority and equivalence trials require tailored methodology and therefore adequate conduct and reporting is an ambitious task. The aim of our review was to assess whether the criteria recommended by the CONSORT extension were followed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 20%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 19 26%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 55%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Mathematics 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 12 16%