You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Regional differences in the global burden of age-related macular degeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-8445-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiayan Xu, Jing Wu, Xiaoning Yu, Yelei Tang, Xiajing Tang, Xingchao Shentu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,152,267
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,279
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,587
of 398,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#31
of 348 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 348 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.