The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Implementation of shared decision-making in oncology: development and pilot study of a nurse-led decision-coaching programme for women with ductal carcinoma in situ
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12911-017-0548-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Birte Berger-Höger, Katrin Liethmann, Ingrid Mühlhauser, Anke Steckelberg |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 25 | 21% |
Unknown | 34 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 16% |
Psychology | 7 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 43 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,087,805
of 26,329,759 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#416
of 2,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,854
of 452,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,329,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.