↓ Skip to main content

Left and right ventricular dyssynchrony and strains from cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking do not predict deterioration of ventricular function in patients with repaired tetralogy of…

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Left and right ventricular dyssynchrony and strains from cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking do not predict deterioration of ventricular function in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12968-016-0268-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linyuan Jing, Gregory J. Wehner, Jonathan D. Suever, Richard J. Charnigo, Sudad Alhadad, Evan Stearns, Dimitri Mojsejenko, Christopher M. Haggerty, Kelsey Hickey, Anne Marie Valente, Tal Geva, Andrew J. Powell, Brandon K. Fornwalt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Postgraduate 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 62%
Engineering 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Materials Science 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,393,326
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#559
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,723
of 356,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.