You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
UV laser mediated cell selective destruction by confocal microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neural Development, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1749-8104-3-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurent Soustelle, Benoît Aigouy, Marie-Laure Asensio, Angela Giangrande |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 24% |
| Engineering | 4 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Neural Development
#68
of 227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,366
of 80,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neural Development
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them