↓ Skip to main content

The negative relationship between patients with NSCLC harbored STK11/KEAP1 copy number variation and immune microenvironment infiltration

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The negative relationship between patients with NSCLC harbored STK11/KEAP1 copy number variation and immune microenvironment infiltration
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12967-021-02924-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chenyue Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#20,707,815
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,408
of 4,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#367,542
of 446,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#83
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.