↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale in the general population

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale in the general population
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-10-135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mike T John, Pernilla Larsson, Krister Nilner, Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, Thomas List

Abstract

The Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES) is an eight-item instrument to assess how patients perceive their dental and facial esthetics. In this cross-sectional study we investigated dimensionality, reliability, and validity of OES scores in the adult general population in Sweden.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Other 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 13 29%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 58%
Engineering 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2012.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,624
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,619
of 285,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#18
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.