↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of health-related quality of life models

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
314 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
797 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review of health-related quality of life models
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-10-134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamilyn Bakas, Susan M McLennon, Janet S Carpenter, Janice M Buelow, Julie L Otte, Kathleen M Hanna, Marsha L Ellett, Kimberly A Hadler, Janet L Welch

Abstract

A systematic literature review was conducted to (a) identify the most frequently used health-related quality of life (HRQOL) models and (b) critique those models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 797 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 781 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 140 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 13%
Researcher 69 9%
Student > Bachelor 63 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 6%
Other 151 19%
Unknown 221 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 197 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 115 14%
Psychology 83 10%
Social Sciences 46 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 2%
Other 95 12%
Unknown 248 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,721,102
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#89
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,420
of 179,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.