↓ Skip to main content

An uncommon inheritance pattern in Niemann-Pick disease type C: identification of probable paternal germline mosaicism in a Mexican family

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An uncommon inheritance pattern in Niemann-Pick disease type C: identification of probable paternal germline mosaicism in a Mexican family
Published in
BMC Neurology, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12883-016-0649-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marivi Cervera-Gaviria, Miguel Angel Alcántara-Ortigoza, Ariadna González-del Angel, Paola Moyers-Pérez, Blanca Gabriela Lizet Legorreta-Ramírez, Nancy Barrera-Carmona, Jaime Cervera-Gaviria

Abstract

Niemann-Pick disease type C (NP-C) is a fatal lysosomal neurodegenerative and neurovisceral disease. It is caused by defects in intracellular lipid trafficking, which lead to the accumulation of lipids and glycosphingolipids within the endosomes and lysosomes of affected individuals. Pathogenic variants of the NPC1 or NPC2 genes yield highly variable phenotypes with a time course that ranges from fetal onset (i.e., hydrops fetalis) to progressive dementia in adults. NP-C is typically inherited in an autosomal-recessive manner. To our knowledge, no previous report has identified germline mosaicism as an inheritance mechanism in NP-C. We report the case of a male Mexican patient with "variant" filipin staining and a juvenile form of NP-C attributed to compound heterozygosity for two previously reported pathogenic variants of NPC1: c.[1042C>T];[2780C>T] or p.[Arg348*];[Ala927Val]. The proband's mother and healthy sister were heterozygous carriers of the c.2780C > T (exon 18) and c.1042C > T (exon 8) variants, respectively. However, direct sequencing of exons 8 and 18 of NPC1 revealed no mutation in genomic DNA obtained from the father's peripheral blood. DNA profiling ruled out the possibility of non-paternity. We were unable to obtain a sperm sample to demonstrate paternal gonadal mosaicism. NPC1 haplotype analysis using 20 linked single nucleotide variants failed to yield sufficient information to document a p.(Arg348*) NPC1 pathogenic variant-associated haplotype in the family. We propose that this case of NP-C involves paternal germline mosaicism. To the best of our knowledge, this has not previously been reported in NP-C.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 32%
Other 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Linguistics 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,858,374
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#1,355
of 2,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,359
of 343,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#51
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.