You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methods for conducting international Delphi surveys to optimise global participation in core outcome set development: a case study in gastric cancer informed by a comprehensive literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-021-05338-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bilal Alkhaffaf, Jane M. Blazeby, Aleksandra Metryka, Anne-Marie Glenny, Ademola Adeyeye, Paulo Matos Costa, Ismael Diez del Val, Suzanne S. Gisbertz, Ali Guner, Simon Law, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Ziyu Li, Koji Nakada, Rafael Mauricio Restrepo Nuñez, Daniel Reim, John V. Reynolds, Peter Vorwald, Daniela Zanotti, William Allum, M. Asif Chaudry, Ewen Griffiths, Paula R. Williamson, Iain A. Bruce, Shuangxi Li, Yu-long He, Zekuan Xu, Yingwei Xue, Han Liang, Guoxin Li, Enhao Zhao, Philipp Neumann, Linda O’Neill, Emer Guinan, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Giovanni de Manzoni, Eliza R. C. Hagens, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Patrícia Lages, Susana Onofre, Gabriel Salcedo Cabañas, Maria Posada Gonzalez, Cristina Marin Campos, Bahar Candas, Bahadır Emre Baki, Muhammed Selim Bodur, Reyyan Yildirim, Arif Burak Cekic, Jean-Baptiste Beuscart, Sophie Horbach, Christopher Mecoli, Toby O. Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 44% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 28% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Librarian | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,898,693
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,036
of 6,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,358
of 444,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#23
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.