↓ Skip to main content

Methods for conducting international Delphi surveys to optimise global participation in core outcome set development: a case study in gastric cancer informed by a comprehensive literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods for conducting international Delphi surveys to optimise global participation in core outcome set development: a case study in gastric cancer informed by a comprehensive literature review
Published in
Trials, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13063-021-05338-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bilal Alkhaffaf, Jane M. Blazeby, Aleksandra Metryka, Anne-Marie Glenny, Ademola Adeyeye, Paulo Matos Costa, Ismael Diez del Val, Suzanne S. Gisbertz, Ali Guner, Simon Law, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Ziyu Li, Koji Nakada, Rafael Mauricio Restrepo Nuñez, Daniel Reim, John V. Reynolds, Peter Vorwald, Daniela Zanotti, William Allum, M. Asif Chaudry, Ewen Griffiths, Paula R. Williamson, Iain A. Bruce, Shuangxi Li, Yu-long He, Zekuan Xu, Yingwei Xue, Han Liang, Guoxin Li, Enhao Zhao, Philipp Neumann, Linda O’Neill, Emer Guinan, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Giovanni de Manzoni, Eliza R. C. Hagens, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Patrícia Lages, Susana Onofre, Gabriel Salcedo Cabañas, Maria Posada Gonzalez, Cristina Marin Campos, Bahar Candas, Bahadır Emre Baki, Muhammed Selim Bodur, Reyyan Yildirim, Arif Burak Cekic, Jean-Baptiste Beuscart, Sophie Horbach, Christopher Mecoli, Toby O. Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Librarian 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Linguistics 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,382,302
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#901
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,559
of 460,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.