You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Uptake and effectiveness of the Children's Fitness Tax Credit in Canada: the rich get richer
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-356 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John C Spence, Nicholas L Holt, Julia K Dutove, Valerie Carson |
Abstract |
The Government of Canada implemented a Children's Fitness Tax Credit (CFTC) in 2007 which allows a non-refundable tax credit of up to $500 to register a child in an eligible physical activity (PA) program. The purposes of this study were to assess whether the awareness, uptake, and perceived effectiveness of this tax credit varied by household income among Canadian parents. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 17 | 59% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 90% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 88 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 20% |
Researcher | 13 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 15 | 16% |
Sports and Recreations | 14 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
Psychology | 10 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 27 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#677,776
of 25,529,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#682
of 17,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,822
of 104,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#6
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,529,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.