↓ Skip to main content

Uptake and effectiveness of the Children's Fitness Tax Credit in Canada: the rich get richer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 X users

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uptake and effectiveness of the Children's Fitness Tax Credit in Canada: the rich get richer
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-356
Pubmed ID
Authors

John C Spence, Nicholas L Holt, Julia K Dutove, Valerie Carson

Abstract

The Government of Canada implemented a Children's Fitness Tax Credit (CFTC) in 2007 which allows a non-refundable tax credit of up to $500 to register a child in an eligible physical activity (PA) program. The purposes of this study were to assess whether the awareness, uptake, and perceived effectiveness of this tax credit varied by household income among Canadian parents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 3%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 88 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 20%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 16%
Sports and Recreations 14 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Psychology 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#677,776
of 25,529,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#682
of 17,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,822
of 104,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#6
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,529,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.