You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of electronic clinical decision support systems: a qualitative interview study with UK general practitioners
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12911-021-01557-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elizabeth Ford, Natalie Edelman, Laura Somers, Duncan Shrewsbury, Marcela Lopez Levy, Harm van Marwijk, Vasa Curcin, Talya Porat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 57% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 18% |
Unknown | 44 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
Other | 21 | 22% |
Unknown | 46 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,175,298
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#622
of 2,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,058
of 460,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#19
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.