You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of different DNA extraction methods and loop-mediated isothermal amplification primers for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans in clinical specimens
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12879-021-06308-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anthony Ablordey, Evans Ahotor, Charles A. Narh, Sandra A. King, Isra Cruz, Joseph M. Ndung’u, Dziedzom K. de Souza |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 1 | 11% |
Ghana | 1 | 11% |
Spain | 1 | 11% |
Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Researcher | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 6 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 16% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,641,224
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,503
of 7,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,202
of 443,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#51
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.