↓ Skip to main content

Isolation and molecular characterization of type I and type II feline coronavirus in Malaysia

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Isolation and molecular characterization of type I and type II feline coronavirus in Malaysia
Published in
Virology Journal, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1743-422x-9-278
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alazawy Amer, Arshad Siti Suri, Omar Abdul Rahman, Hair Bejo Mohd, Bande Faruku, Sharif Saeed, Tengku Ibrahim Tengku Azmi

Abstract

Feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) and feline enteric coronavirus (FECV) are two important coronaviruses of domestic cat worldwide. Although FCoV is prevalent among cats; the fastidious nature of type I FCoV to grow on cell culture has limited further studies on tissue tropism and pathogenesis of FCoV. While several studies reported serological evidence for FCoV in Malaysia, neither the circulating FCoV isolated nor its biotypes determined. This study for the first time, describes the isolation and biotypes determination of type I and type II FCoV from naturally infected cats in Malaysia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 24%
Student > Master 12 19%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,227,301
of 25,171,799 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#312
of 3,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,420
of 289,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#3
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,171,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.