↓ Skip to main content

Favorable outcome of Epstein-Barr virus-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder complicated by immunoglobulin G4-related disease treated with rituximab-based therapy: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Favorable outcome of Epstein-Barr virus-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder complicated by immunoglobulin G4-related disease treated with rituximab-based therapy: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13256-016-1009-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koki Ueda, Kazuhiko Ikeda, Kazuei Ogawa, Masumi Sukegawa, Takahiro Sano, Satoshi Kimura, Osamu Suzuki, Yuko Hashimoto, Yasuchika Takeishi

Abstract

After acute infection of Epstein-Barr virus, Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells survive but usually do not show clonal proliferation. However, Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells occasionally acquire a proliferative capacity that provokes clonal lymphoproliferative disorders. We herein present a case with Epstein-Barr virus-infected CD30+ B cell and immunoglobulin G4+ plasmacytoid cell proliferation in the lymph nodes, suggesting a pathological and clinical interaction between Epstein-Barr virus-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders and immunoglobulin G4-related disease. Immunoglobulin G4-related disease has been recognized as a benign disease with proliferation of IgG4-related disease+ plasmacytoid cells. Several studies have recently reported the coexistence of immunoglobulin G4-related disease+ plasmacytoid cells with Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells in lymph nodes in some immunoglobulin G4-related disease cases. However, the pathogenic role of the clonal proliferation of Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells in immunoglobulin G4-related disease, as well as the treatments for patients with both Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells and immunoglobulin G4-related disease, have never been discussed. A 50-year-old Japanese man was referred to us for persistent fatigue and lymphadenopathy. His blood examination showed elevated IgG4, and detected high levels of Epstein-Barr virus DNA. A lymph node biopsy revealed IgG4+ plasmacytoid cells and infiltration of large lymphoid cells, which were positive for CD20, CD30, Epstein-Barr virus-related late membrane protein 1, and Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA, and were negative for IgG4. Based on the diagnosis of both Epstein-Barr virus-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder and IgG4-related disease, the patient received eight cycles of rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide and prednisolone, which resulted in the complete disappearance of lymphadenopathy. Moreover, his serum IgG4 level was significantly reduced, and plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA became undetectable. Although prednisolone was transiently administered in each cycle of immunochemotherapy, the therapeutic effect has persisted for Epstein-Barr virus-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder and IgG4-related disease as of 1 year after finishing treatment. In the present case, clinical presentation and pathological findings revealed that Epstein-Barr virus-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder coexisted with IgG4-related disease. Although several studies have described the relationship between Epstein-Barr virus-infected B cells and IgG4-related disease, this is the first report of a patient whose plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA level, which correlated with the disease statuses of both diseases, was monitored. Moreover, rituximab-based immunochemotherapy was highly effective for both diseases. Our findings are suggestive for establishing a novel treatment strategy for IgG4-related disorders associated with chronic Epstein-Barr virus infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 65%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,467,727
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#2,267
of 3,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,456
of 341,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#41
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,931 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.