↓ Skip to main content

Mutation patterns of mtDNA: Empirical inferences for the coding region

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutation patterns of mtDNA: Empirical inferences for the coding region
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-8-167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Santos, Rafael Montiel, Adriana Arruda, Luis Alvarez, Maria Pilar Aluja, Manuela Lima

Abstract

Human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been extensively used in population and evolutionary genetics studies. Thus, a valid estimate of human mtDNA evolutionary rate is important in many research fields. The small number of estimations performed for the coding region of the molecule, showed important differences between phylogenetic and empirical approaches. We analyzed a portion of the coding region of mtDNA (tRNALeu, ND1 and tRNAIle genes), using individuals belonging to extended families from the Azores Islands (Portugal) with the main aim of providing empirical estimations of the mutation rate of the coding region of mtDNA under different assumptions, and hence to better understand the mtDNA evolutionary process.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Chile 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 62 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 29%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Researcher 10 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Professor 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 16%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 7 10%