You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
“More bang for the buck”: exploring optimal approaches for guideline implementation through interviews with international developers
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-404 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anna R Gagliardi |
Abstract |
Population based studies show that guidelines are underused. Surveys of international guideline developers found that many do not implement their guidelines. The purpose of this research was to interview guideline developers about implementation approaches and resources. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Peru | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 54 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 19% |
Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 27% |
Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 15% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 14 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2014.
All research outputs
#6,912,452
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,389
of 7,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,706
of 178,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#47
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.