↓ Skip to main content

“More bang for the buck”: exploring optimal approaches for guideline implementation through interviews with international developers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“More bang for the buck”: exploring optimal approaches for guideline implementation through interviews with international developers
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-404
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna R Gagliardi

Abstract

Population based studies show that guidelines are underused. Surveys of international guideline developers found that many do not implement their guidelines. The purpose of this research was to interview guideline developers about implementation approaches and resources.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 50 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 13 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2014.
All research outputs
#5,783,324
of 21,339,655 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,754
of 7,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,681
of 289,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#112
of 385 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,339,655 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 385 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.