You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Power to the people: a wiki-governance model for biobanks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2012-13-5-158 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward S Dove, Yann Joly, Bartha M Knoppers |
| Abstract |
Biobanks are adopting various modes of public engagement to close the agency gap between participants and biobank builders. We propose a wiki-governance model for biobanks that harnesses Web 2.0, and which gives citizens the ability to collaborate in biobank governance and policymaking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Portugal | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 58 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Philosophy | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 30% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2012.
All research outputs
#3,261,678
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,355
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,020
of 178,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#21
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.