↓ Skip to main content

Prolonged transfer of feces from the lean mice modulates gut microbiota in obese mice

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prolonged transfer of feces from the lean mice modulates gut microbiota in obese mice
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12986-016-0116-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Kulecka, Agnieszka Paziewska, Natalia Zeber-Lubecka, Filip Ambrozkiewicz, Michal Kopczynski, Urszula Kuklinska, Kazimiera Pysniak, Marta Gajewska, Michal Mikula, Jerzy Ostrowski

Abstract

Transplanting a fecal sample from lean, healthy donors to obese recipients has been shown to improve metabolic syndrome symptoms. We therefore examined the gut microbiota in mice after administering a long-term, high-fat diet (HFD) supplemented with feces from lean mice through the fecal-oral route. C57BL6/W mice were allowed to adapt to a non-specific pathogen free (SFP) environment for 2 weeks before being divided into three groups of 16 animals. Animals were fed for 28 weeks with a normal diet (ND), HFD or HFD supplemented with feces from ND-fed mice (HFDS). The composition of colonizing bacteria was evaluated in droppings collected under SPF conditions at the beginning of the study and at 12 and 28 weeks using an 16S Metagenomics Kit on Ion PGM sequencer. HFD and HFDS-fed mice attained (p < 0.05) greater body weights by weeks 6 and 5, respectively. HFDS-fed mice gained more weight than HFD-fed mice by week 25. Both species diversity and richness indices increased with time in HFDS mice only. Prolonged HFD-fed mice supplementation with feces from lean mice altered bacteria species diversity and richness, accelerated the onset of obesity, and caused increased weight gain in the later weeks of the HFD regimen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 35 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,118,525
of 25,802,847 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#254
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,148
of 355,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,802,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.