↓ Skip to main content

In-vivo application of low frequency alternating currents on porcine cervical vagus nerve evokes reversible nerve conduction block

Overview of attention for article published in Bioelectronic Medicine, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In-vivo application of low frequency alternating currents on porcine cervical vagus nerve evokes reversible nerve conduction block
Published in
Bioelectronic Medicine, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s42234-021-00072-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Ivette Muzquiz, Lindsay Richardson, Christian Vetter, Macallister Smolik, Awadh Alhawwash, Adam Goodwill, Rizwan Bashirullah, Michael Carr, Ken Yoshida

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,927,938
of 21,528,315 outputs
Outputs from Bioelectronic Medicine
#38
of 92 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,354
of 342,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioelectronic Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,528,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them