You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An assessment of monitoring requirements and costs of 'Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation'
|
---|---|
Published in |
Carbon Balance and Management, August 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1750-0680-4-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hannes Böttcher, Katja Eisbrenner, Steffen Fritz, Georg Kindermann, Florian Kraxner, Ian McCallum, Michael Obersteiner |
Abstract |
Negotiations on a future climate policy framework addressing Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) are ongoing. Regardless of how such a framework will be designed, many technical solutions of estimating forest cover and forest carbon stock change exist to support policy in monitoring and accounting. These technologies typically combine remotely sensed data with ground-based inventories. In this article we assess the costs of monitoring REDD based on available technologies and requirements associated with key elements of REDD policy. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
Germany | 3 | 1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Uganda | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 2% |
Unknown | 226 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 59 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 14% |
Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 6% |
Other | 56 | 22% |
Unknown | 37 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 95 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 13% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 31 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 3% |
Other | 25 | 10% |
Unknown | 42 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,763,141
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#67
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,722
of 92,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them