You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of baseline methodologies for 'Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation'
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Carbon Balance and Management, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-0680-4-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Huettner, Rik Leemans, Kasper Kok, Johannes Ebeling |
| Abstract |
A mechanism for emission reductions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) is very likely to be included in a future climate agreement. The choice of REDD baseline methodologies will crucially influence the environmental and economic effectiveness of the climate regime. We compare three different historical baseline methods and one innovative dynamic model baseline approach to appraise their applicability under a future REDD policy framework using a weighted multi-criteria analysis. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 139 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 59 | 39% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,148,960
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#61
of 222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,820
of 122,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them