You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Spatial progression and molecular heterogeneity of IDH-mutant glioblastoma determined by DNA methylation-based mapping
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, June 2021
James F. Lyon, Varshini Vasudevaraja, Kanish Mirchia, Jamie M. Walker, Robert J. Corona, Lawrence S. Chin, Ivy Tran, Matija Snuderl, Timothy E. Richardson, Mariano S. Viapiano
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||5||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||1||20%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||2||40%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
of 1,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 442,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.