You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How ethics committees and requirements are structuring health research in the Philippines: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-021-00653-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gideon Lasco, Vincen Gregory Yu, Lia Palileo-Villanueva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 10 | 42% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 50% |
| Scientists | 8 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,038,866
of 24,804,602 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#193
of 1,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,636
of 433,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#11
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,804,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.