↓ Skip to main content

Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: the leiden routine outcome monitoring study
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-12-203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne WM Schulte-van Maaren, Ingrid VE Carlier, Frans G Zitman, Albert M van Hemert, Margot WM de Waal, Martijn S van Noorden, Erik J Giltay

Abstract

The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Mood & Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire -30 (MASQ-D30), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), and Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Short Form (DAPP-SF) are generic instruments that can be used in Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) of patients with common mental disorders. We aimed to generate reference values usually encountered in 'healthy' and 'psychiatrically ill' populations to facilitate correct interpretation of ROM results.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 57 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 31%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2012.
All research outputs
#2,315,786
of 4,506,977 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,101
of 1,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,276
of 279,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#54
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,977 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.