You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutritional status of young children in Mumbai slums: a follow-up anthropometric study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-11-100 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sushmita Das, Ujwala Bapat, Neena Shah More, Glyn Alcock, Armida Fernandez, David Osrin |
| Abstract |
Chronic childhood malnutrition remains common in India. As part of an initiative to improve maternal and child health in urban slums, we collected anthropometric data from a sample of children followed up from birth. We described the proportions of underweight, stunting, and wasting in young children, and examined their relationships with age. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 47% |
| Canada | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 40 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2012.
All research outputs
#1,910,992
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#473
of 1,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,497
of 276,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#16
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.