You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-717x-7-197 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Baojuan Yang, Lin Zhu, Haiyan Cheng, Qi Li, Yunyan Zhang, Yashuang Zhao |
| Abstract |
To quantitatively evaluate the safety and related-toxicities of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) dose-volume histograms (DVHs), as compared to the conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), in gynecologic malignancy patients by systematic review of the related publications and meta-analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Portugal | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 16 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 27 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,140,433
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#597
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,646
of 276,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#14
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.