↓ Skip to main content

Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
59 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
Published in
Implementation Science, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13012-021-01111-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea L. Nevedal, Caitlin M. Reardon, Marilla A. Opra Widerquist, George L. Jackson, Sarah L. Cutrona, Brandolyn S. White, Laura J. Damschroder

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 245 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 4%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 93 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 14%
Social Sciences 28 11%
Psychology 25 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 9%
Unspecified 8 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 102 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,129,409
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#177
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,342
of 455,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.