↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the impact of more realistic low-dose, prolonged engineered nanomaterial exposure on genotoxicity using 3D models of the human liver

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanobiotechnology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding the impact of more realistic low-dose, prolonged engineered nanomaterial exposure on genotoxicity using 3D models of the human liver
Published in
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12951-021-00938-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha V. Llewellyn, Gillian E. Conway, Ilaria Zanoni, Amalie Kofoed Jørgensen, Ume-Kulsoom Shah, Didem Ag Seleci, Johannes G. Keller, Jeong Won Kim, Wendel Wohlleben, Keld Alstrup Jensen, Anna Costa, Gareth J. S. Jenkins, Martin J. D. Clift, Shareen H. Doak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Other 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#20,707,815
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#1,295
of 1,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#363,808
of 442,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#78
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.