↓ Skip to main content

Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (I…

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13017-021-00378-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mauro Podda, Patricia Sylla, Gianluca Baiocchi, Michel Adamina, Vanni Agnoletti, Ferdinando Agresta, Luca Ansaloni, Alberto Arezzo, Nicola Avenia, Walter Biffl, Antonio Biondi, Simona Bui, Fabio C. Campanile, Paolo Carcoforo, Claudia Commisso, Antonio Crucitti, Nicola De’Angelis, Gian Luigi De’Angelis, Massimo De Filippo, Belinda De Simone, Salomone Di Saverio, Giorgio Ercolani, Gustavo P. Fraga, Francesco Gabrielli, Federica Gaiani, Mario Guerrieri, Angelo Guttadauro, Yoram Kluger, Ari K. Leppaniemi, Andrea Loffredo, Tiziana Meschi, Ernest E. Moore, Monica Ortenzi, Francesco Pata, Dario Parini, Adolfo Pisanu, Gilberto Poggioli, Andrea Polistena, Alessandro Puzziello, Fabio Rondelli, Massimo Sartelli, Neil Smart, Michael E. Sugrue, Patricia Tejedor, Marco Vacante, Federico Coccolini, Justin Davies, Fausto Catena

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 35 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Engineering 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 40 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,283,630
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#109
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,316
of 455,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.