↓ Skip to main content

What is the impact of the use of transanastomotic feeding tube on patients with esophageal atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What is the impact of the use of transanastomotic feeding tube on patients with esophageal atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12887-018-1359-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuan Wang, Liwei Feng, Yanan Li, Yi Ji

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 47%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2021.
All research outputs
#17,345,949
of 21,467,744 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,169
of 2,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,481
of 341,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,467,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them