↓ Skip to main content

Irritable bowel syndrome-specific health-related quality of life instrument: development and psychometric evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Irritable bowel syndrome-specific health-related quality of life instrument: development and psychometric evaluation
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12955-016-0423-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eun-Hyun Lee, Oran Kwon, Ki Baik Hahm, WonHee Kim, Jin Il Kim, Dae Young Cheung, Yoon Jae Kim, Jung Ho Kim, Jong-Jae Park, Moon Kyung Joo

Abstract

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important outcome indicator for chronic disease, and particularly in the absence of biological markers for illness, such as with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aims of this study were to develop and evaluate a new IBS-specific HRQOL instrument (IBS-HR-QOL). This methodological study comprised three steps: conceptualization of the IBS-HR-QOL, item extraction and establishment of content validity, and psychometric evaluation of the instrument with 267 IBS patients recruited from four university hospitals. The content validity of the developed IBS-HR-QOL was assessed by 11 experts. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded four factors. The criterion and convergent validities of the IBS-HR-QOL were demonstrated using the Short Form-36 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, respectively. Known-groups validity was demonstrated using a symptom-severity scale. The internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability were satisfactory, with a Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.93 and 0.88, respectively. The IBS-HR-QOL comprises a total of 16 items. The IBS-HR-QOL demonstrated good psychometric properties. This instrument is easily comprehensible and short, rendering it feasible for use in clinical practice and research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Unspecified 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 28 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Unspecified 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 30 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,338,537
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,973
of 2,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,749
of 297,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#36
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.