You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Corynebacterium ulcerans 0102 carries the gene encoding diphtheria toxin on a prophage different from the C. diphtheriae NCTC 13129 prophage
BMC Microbiology, May 2012
Tsuyoshi Sekizuka, Akihiko Yamamoto, Takako Komiya, Tsuyoshi Kenri, Fumihiko Takeuchi, Keigo Shibayama, Motohide Takahashi, Makoto Kuroda, Masaaki Iwaki
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||10||22%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||6||13%|
|Student > Bachelor||4||9%|
|Student > Postgraduate||3||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||15||33%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||12||27%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||3||7%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||3||7%|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
of 3,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 165,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,238 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.