You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Severe community-acquired pneumonia: timely management measures in the first 24 hours
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1414-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason Phua, Nathan C. Dean, Qi Guo, Win Sen Kuan, Hui Fang Lim, Tow Keang Lim |
| Abstract |
Mortality rates for severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) range from 17 to 48 % in published studies.In this review, we searched PubMed for relevant papers published between 1981 and June 2016 and relevant files. We explored how early and aggressive management measures, implemented within 24 hours of recognition of severe CAP and carried out both in the emergency department and in the ICU, decrease mortality in severe CAP.These measures begin with the use of severity assessment tools and the application of care bundles via clinical decision support tools. The bundles include early guideline-concordant antibiotics including macrolides, early haemodynamic support (lactate measurement, intravenous fluids, and vasopressors), and early respiratory support (high-flow nasal cannulae, lung-protective ventilation, prone positioning, and neuromuscular blockade for acute respiratory distress syndrome).While the proposed interventions appear straightforward, multiple barriers to their implementation exist. To successfully decrease mortality for severe CAP, early and close collaboration between emergency medicine and respiratory and critical care medicine teams is required. We propose a workflow incorporating these interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 16% |
| United States | 9 | 8% |
| Mexico | 8 | 8% |
| Spain | 5 | 5% |
| Brazil | 4 | 4% |
| Colombia | 3 | 3% |
| Costa Rica | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 81 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 19% |
| Scientists | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 230 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 14% |
| Researcher | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 22% |
| Unknown | 47 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 127 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 58 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#601,995
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#399
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,658
of 348,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#20
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.