You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Motivation and treatment engagement intervention trial (MotivaTe-IT): the effects of motivation feedback to clinicians on treatment engagement in patients with severe mental illness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-12-209 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eline C Jochems, Cornelis L Mulder, Arno van Dam, Hugo J Duivenvoorden, Sylvia CM Scheffer, Willem van der Spek, Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis |
| Abstract |
Treatment disengagement and non-completion poses a major problem for the successful treatment of patients with severe mental illness. Motivation for treatment has long been proposed as a major determinant of treatment engagement, but exact mechanisms remain unclear. This current study serves three purposes: 1) to determine whether a feedback intervention based on the patients' motivation for treatment is effective at improving treatment engagement (TE) of severe mentally ill patients in outpatient psychiatric treatment, 2) to gather insight into motivational processes and possible mechanisms regarding treatment motivation (TM) and TE in this patient population and 3) to determine which of three theories of motivation is most plausible for the dynamics of TM and TE in this population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 41 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 62 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 51 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2012.
All research outputs
#14,156,397
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,016
of 4,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,972
of 276,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#48
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.