↓ Skip to main content

The Physiotherapy eSkills Training Onlineresource improves performance of practical skills: a controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Physiotherapy eSkills Training Onlineresource improves performance of practical skills: a controlled trial
Published in
BMC Medical Education, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-12-119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabeth Preston, Louise Ada, Catherine M Dean, Rosalyn Stanton, Gordon Waddington, Colleen Canning

Abstract

E-learning is a common and popular mode of educational delivery, but little is known about its effectiveness in teaching practical skills. The aim of this study was to determine whether the Physiotherapy eSkills Training Online resource in addition to usual teaching improved the performance of practical skills in physiotherapy students.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 191 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 18%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 47 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 38 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 18%
Psychology 17 9%
Neuroscience 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 55 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#13,876,749
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,869
of 3,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,260
of 276,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#18
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.