↓ Skip to main content

Validity of observational evidence on putative risk and protective factors: appraisal of 3744 meta-analyses on 57 topics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
52 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity of observational evidence on putative risk and protective factors: appraisal of 3744 meta-analyses on 57 topics
Published in
BMC Medicine, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12916-021-02020-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Perrine Janiaud, Arnav Agarwal, Ioanna Tzoulaki, Evropi Theodoratou, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Evangelos Evangelou, John P. A. Ioannidis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,364,365
of 24,166,358 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#950
of 3,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,845
of 428,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#16
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,166,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.