You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health technology assessment in sub-Saharan Africa: a descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-021-00293-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samantha Hollingworth, Ama Pokuaa Fenny, Su-Yeon Yu, Francis Ruiz, Kalipso Chalkidou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Zambia | 1 | 6% |
| Oman | 1 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 55 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 57 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,056,468
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#66
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,832
of 450,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.