↓ Skip to main content

Undifferentiated-type gastric adenocarcinoma: prognostic impact of three histological types

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Undifferentiated-type gastric adenocarcinoma: prognostic impact of three histological types
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-10-254
Pubmed ID
Authors

Han Hong Lee, Kyo Young Song, Cho Hyun Park, Hae Myung Jeon

Abstract

The prognostic value of the three constituents of undifferentiated-type gastric adenocarcinoma remains unclear. The present study assessed the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of undifferentiated-type mucinous adenocarcinoma (uMAC) and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) compared with those of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Chemical Engineering 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2012.
All research outputs
#18,321,703
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1,021
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,888
of 276,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#25
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.