You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Wild leafy vegetables: A study of their subsistence dietetic support to the inhabitants of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, May 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-4-15 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shalini Misra, RK Maikhuri, CP Kala, KS Rao, KG Saxena |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 4 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 146 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 22% |
Student > Master | 26 | 17% |
Researcher | 19 | 12% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Lecturer | 7 | 5% |
Other | 28 | 18% |
Unknown | 32 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 36% |
Environmental Science | 18 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
Other | 21 | 14% |
Unknown | 38 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#327
of 744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,110
of 83,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.