You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diversity and use of wild and non-cultivated edible plants in the Western Himalaya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13002-018-0211-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kamal Prasad Aryal, Sushmita Poudel, Ram Prasad Chaudhary, Nakul Chettri, Pashupati Chaudhary, Wu Ning, Rajan Kotru |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 213 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 84 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 95 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,833,191
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#177
of 744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,285
of 443,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.