↓ Skip to main content

Perception and utilization of public health services in Southeast Nigeria: Implication for health care in communities with different degrees of urbanization

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perception and utilization of public health services in Southeast Nigeria: Implication for health care in communities with different degrees of urbanization
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12939-016-0294-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nkechi G. Onyeneho, Uche V. Amazigo, Ngozi A. Njepuome, Obioma C. Nwaorgu, Joseph C. Okeibunor

Abstract

The relationship between people's perception and utilization of public health serviceswas investigated. A survey of 840 households across selected urban, peri urban and rural communities, in the Southeast of Nigeria, was conducted using the mixed methods approach. Of the nine (9) demographic variables, only the locality and status of the health system (strong or weak in terms of child immunization) was found to influence both the poor rating and utilization of public health services. Individuals from states with strong health system rated relatively higher and used public health services more (p < 0.001), than their counterparts from states with weak health care system. Similarly, those in the urban or peri-urban localities used public health services more (p = 0.013). The two perceptual variables significantly influence the rating and use of public health services. Those with a good perception of the quality of health service provided, rated and patronized them more (p < 0.001). Also, health centres that provide a high number of services enjoyed greater rating and patronage (p < 0.001 and p = 0.0524 respectively). The results of the structured questionnaire survey were confirmed by qualitative enquiry,based on in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. It will be necessary to create a more responsive atmosphere in the health facilities, with culturally-sensitive and friendly health workers, and provision of affordable drug to improve the perceptions of the primary health care system, for it to succeed in providing health services for all.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 160 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 21%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 41 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 16%
Social Sciences 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 51 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,338,537
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,859
of 1,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,822
of 394,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#46
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.